GreenCoast Hydroponics, a warehouse store popular with cannabis growers, reported inflated prices for fertilizer and other growing equipment, in Sun Valley, Calif., on Feb. 23, 2022. (Jill McLaughlin/The Epoch Times)
John Mac Ghlionn
March 12, 2022 Updated: March 12, 2022
How does a society collapse?
According to Joseph Tainter, a renowned anthropologist, societies collapse when they display a profound loss of sociopolitical complexity.
But, I argue, there is another reason why societies collapse; it involves self-reliance, or lack thereof. The more a country relies on another country for support, the greater the chance of collapse. Self-sustainability is the key to progress. This might sound like an obvious point to make, but it’s one that many countries around the world have repeatedly failed to heed, including the United States.
Today, from South America to Southeast Asia, import dependency reigns supreme. “Dependency” being the operative word. Take Nepal, for example, a country I have spent plenty of time in (my fiancée comes from the capital, Kathmandu). The Nepalese economy is heavily dependent on imports of basic materials, including coal briquettes and ovoids, as well as a whole host of other solid fuels. The Himalayan nation imports 73 percent of its coal. Nepal also imports large amounts of construction materials and metals.
Agriculture provides livelihoods for 68 percent of Nepal’s 30 million citizens. The agriculture sector relies heavily on the use of chemical fertilizers imported from abroad. Right now, across the country, there exists a severe shortage of chemical fertilizers. Economists have warned that this shortage could last for the rest of the year. This shortage will drive up the costs of food and will also result in a profound drop in crop yields, which will then drive prices up even more.
China is the primary exporter of chemical fertilizers to Nepal. Now, though, China appears rather reluctant to export any more chemical fertilizers to its supposed friend. Food security was already an issue before the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) refused to sell any more chemical fertilizers to Nepal.
Worryingly, China is the primary exporter of chemical fertilizers not just to Nepal, but to almost all major countries around the world.
A Looming Crisis
South American countries produce much of the world’s avocados, corn, and coffee. Lack of access to fertilizers is “making it much costlier to cultivate” these crops. In fact, it’s forcing many farmers to cease production entirely.
Of course, what’s happening in South America will have global consequences. As the Journal piece warns, expect grocery bills to “go up even more in 2022, following a year in which global food prices rose to decade highs.”
Moreover, this uptick looks likely to “exacerbate hunger—already acute in some parts of the world because of pandemic-linked job losses—and thwart efforts by politicians and central bankers to subdue inflation.”
According to credible reports, 70 percent of China’s fertilizer exports go to countries in South America.
A number of China’s biggest fertilizer companies have said they are banning the export of phosphate—the key ingredient in commercial fertilizers—until at least June.
Two reasons: to ensure the supply of fertilizers at home; and to secure the country’s food production.
China is the biggest producer of fertilizers in the world, producing more than the United States and India combined. Not surprisingly, China is also the world’s largest exporter of fertilizers. You might not like the way communist China does business (and you really shouldn’t), but the manner in which it controls the world’s supply of valuable goods is as impressive as it is terrifying.
Across Europe, farmers are also feeling the pinch. As Bloomberg writers Yuliya Fedorinova, Megan Durisin, and Veronika Gulyas recently reported, with farmers in countries like France and Germany preparing to spread fertilizers on fields, “sky-high nutrient prices are leaving them little choice but to use less and try to pass on the cost down the food chain.”
What about the United States, one of the world’s top importers of fertilizers? Is there reason for concern? In short, yes. China is the United States’ biggest supplier of fertilizers. Or at least it was, before the CCP decided to curb exports.
As Food Business News warns, in the United States, the word “fertilizer” has become synonymous with another word, “H-E-L-P,” “due to tight supplies and soaring prices.” Supplies, or lack thereof, according to the authors, will only serve to drive “crop production costs upward.” Moreover, the rise in production costs may have a particularly negative impact on corn yields, as the crop has “high fertilizer (nitrogen) requirements and a high breakeven point.”
In the United States, corn is the primary feed grain, accounting “for more than 95 percent of total feed grain production and use,” according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Along with key producing countries, like China, curbing production and exports of fertilizers, sky-high freight costs and logistical issues have further compounded matters.
Things are bad. Very bad. The proverbial has very much hit the fan. As the author Michael Syder recently warned, “dramatically increased costs for fertilizer” is making it impossible for many American farmers to make a living.
The United States, much like Nepal, is import dependent. In fact, its dependency is comparable with a number of Third World countries. You know what other things you associate with Third World countries? Food shortages, crop crises, and widespread hunger. The United States is already experiencing all three. Expect things to get considerably worse before they get better.
Self-sufficiency, the very thing the United States needs, is sorely lacking. It has been for years. Now, sadly, average Americans are the ones left to foot the bill and pay the heftiest of prices.
Views expressed in this article are the opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.
John Mac Ghlionn is a researcher and essayist. His work has been published by the New York Post, Sydney Morning Herald, Newsweek, National Review, and The Spectator US, among others. He covers psychology and social relations, and has a keen interest in social dysfunction and media manipulation.