Phản ứng “trái chiều”
với quyết định của Tối Cao Pháp Viện Tiểu Bang Colorado: loại tên ông Trump ra khỏi lá phiếu bầu cử sơ bộ của tiểu bang
Nguyễn Thị Bé Bảy sưu tầm trong phần comments của
MSNBC Breaking News ngày 19/12/23
Phần lớn ý kiến đều hoan hô quyết định này, nhưng cũng có những ý kiến như sau:
– I’m all for this, BUT…they are going to say that he was not ‘convicted’ yet for being in the Insurrection.
– No conviction but still punished got it… guilty until proven innocent is the new norm.
– If they can read, SCOTUS must rule likewise. May democracy save itself. And the world.
– Um, is that legal for them to do that? I mean, is there a legal frame work to say that even if he is 100% guilty of it. Is it really legal to remove him as a candidate?
– @jeffrichey3623
20 minutes ago
There is virtually no chance that this is upheld. Those who are trying to get him off the ballot are just going to build more support for him when eventually folks will be able to vote for him. It’s a special kind of stupid what they’re doing.
– @AmericanAntiCorruptionAct
13 minutes ago
IMAGINE HOW STRONG OUR COUNTRY WOULD BE IF PRESIDENTS SPENT THEIR DAYS WORKING FOR THE PEOPLE WHO ELECTED THEM INSTEAD OF THE PEOPLE WHO BUY THEM.
Don’t take this news too seriously…there will be MANY actions and reactions between now and November.
– @justinbieber12373
6 minutes ago
BOOM HIS POLLS JUST WENT UP ,,, GREAT JOB !!!
– @lastcoyote2355
11 minutes ago
Really ? It took almost 4 years to decide this . HE ATTEMPTED AN INSURRECTION !!!!! HE’S A TRAITOR!!!! GEEEZZZ!!!
– @bobbobbington3615
1 minute ago
So… without being found guilty, a Court passed sentence?
Guess I’ll write his name in.
– @billytheweasel
2 minutes ago
Time for the US Supreme Court to show the world if we’re a banana republic or still a republic.
– @drupenrod786
35 minutes ago
So a person can be accused of what ever not convicted and a state can denie them and their voters to vote in a federal election. Well if so then we no longer have a vote. Who ever holds the power does.
– @michaeldomansky8497
24 minutes ago
An unconstitutional ruling!
– @RhiannaBaker-mw7hb
32 minutes ago (edited)
They said you called for the insurrection that one word can change everything
– @PDXpackrat
26 minutes ago
Is there a legal definition for “insurrection” as it applies to the 14th amendment, or is it just a word that can be thrown around like sedition used to be with the Sedition and Treason Act of 1918?
I haven’t been following this as much as I would like to have, but I’m really curious what the legal definition of insurrection is in this context.
– @flavio-p
19 minutes ago
“He’s a danger to our democracy. Also, we’re canceling democracy.”
– @hint0122
1 minute ago
He wasn’t charged with insurrection, so how could they use that as a reason?
– @danielburnett9321
1 minute ago
Did the definition of insurrection change in the last couple of years?
– @wandafrancis0
1 hour ago
Watching from Trinidad and Tobago 🇹🇹 everything has its due course
– @KPVFarmer
41 minutes ago
The fact that it’s not a 7-0 unanimous ruling is concerning. Insurrectionists should NOT be on the ballot anywhere! Just Say’n 🇺🇸🇺🇸
– @dinobernardi170
30 minutes ago
I must of missed it but…..was he tried and convicted of insurrection? O, ok just heard they fact finded
-@hugowiberg1843
10 minutes ago
Convicted of… Nothing.
– @sambrassart8473
1 hour ago
I can understand them wanting to do something. Trumps poll numbers have skyrocketed with the reality tv court case he has been acting in.
– @freewilly8355
13 minutes ago
lol it won’t stick because he hasn’t been found guilty of anything
– @goodfriendg
1 hour ago
He has not been convicted of having any part of the so called insurrection. How can a court determine this without any conviction ?
– @GEN_X_
1 hour ago
LOL Nothing going to happen COMMIES. Supreme Court will reverse your treasonous liberal courts. Trump was never prosecuted for insurrection.
– @thatlife4u
25 minutes ago
First question, who has been convicted of “insurrection” ? Second question, How do you bring together a stronger coalition? This move just solidified who will win in November 2024
– @barryb83110
2 hours ago
The lower court ruling was simply a test balloon to see who would react and to what part of the ruling. Insurrection was confirmed but a president was immune apparently did not fly. If the insurrection was confirmed and the president is not immune from responsibility, the logical next step is prosecution.
– @jmatt4life
8 minutes ago (edited)
She had trouble saying Trump is the Republican front runner.
Trump is on video and text and he did not call for any insurrection!
– @tomaaron6187
5 minutes ago
Colorado just solidified Trump’s victory in November.
– @CentaurusRelax314
1 hour ago
Please explain this: if he’s not on the Colorado primary ballot, does that mean he’s also not on the Colorado ballot if he still wins the GOP nomination? Then, if he wins the presidential election without those 10 electoral votes, Colorado doesn’t recognize him as President? Swing states Ohio and Penn doing the same would be nice, but I’m not holding my breath.
-@johnmann3970
1 hour ago
I”m not a Trump fan,. but I have to ask. Was Trump charged and/or convicted of insurrection? I don’t think he was. I’m a bit concerned that a Colorado court has become prosecutor, judge and jury and declared the essence of a conviction when there have been no charges of insurrection filed.
– @motionattached
54 minutes ago
If Colorado has that right, they would also have the right to declare independence.
– @neightee
1 hour ago
So….fly the Colorado flag above the US flag because they take the constitution and order of law more seriously?
– @hippygaming2740
1 hour ago
The Supreme Court has to rule on this before Jan 5th (I think) for Trump to be able to be on ANY ballot. There is a law that says something about the nominees have to be submitted by then. Just because I call you a racist does not mean that you are a racist. Innocent until proven guilty. If no insurrection, then no 14th Amendment.
– @sherievans2617
3 minutes ago (edited)
Pass an AMENDMENT
No convicted criminals can stand for public office!
Australian 🇦🇺 friends
– @johnbarry3275
58 minutes ago
Does any one believe we are not a Dictatorship ?
– @DeBee-dc9ce
1 hour ago
So Colorado Democrat appointed judges are going to get to decide who Americans can vote for in a Republican primary, a person not convicted. Hmmm, that smacks of Election Interference. If the Dems would go this far, what else are the capable of doing?
– @joeloconte2314
1 minute ago
I thought we the people get to vote for who we want ? Let the people speak. I mean they all say he will lose so why are they scared?
– @richardmurphy1771
3 minutes ago
Can the courts practice medicine without a license In 6th speaking these courts should be charged with doing just?
– @lemonielala3080
35 minutes ago
He’ll win all the other states, right? And would the colorado votes even go to the republican nominee? Isn’t Colorado blue? I’m not up on my election maps….. So if it’s blue, this doesn’t really affect anything…?
– @marcyhigh63
2 hours ago
I don’t want judges to decide who I can vote for and it sounds like a 3rd world dictatorship decision to me. “Here’s who you guys can vote for? I don’t want America to turn into a world like that. As far as Trump goes, he’s never been charged in a court of law for an insurrection so how can he be penalized for an insurrection? I just wish fbi, cia, Russia, China, news media and anybody else would stay out of the election process and let the American people vote for their next president.
– @georgetran1766
48 seconds ago
I would say the people of CO are treated unfairly. Would this decision be considered as a violation of human rights?
– @blabberwulf7650
3 minutes ago
Who falsely represented themselves as representing the citizens of the State of Colorado before this Knowingly illegal proceeding.
– @MultisportOfficial
2 hours ago
I have a problem with this ruling. Colorado is ruling that Trump engaged in insurrection, but I don’t recall Trump ever being tried in that state. He is currently awaiting trial in federal court on insurrection charges and until convicted, I don’t see how the Colorado ruling has any real impact. I believe the similar motions in Arizona, Michigan and Minnesota were rejected for this very reason. Let the federal court do its job. If he’s convicted (and I believe he will be), he will then be barred from every ballot in the country. Then we can celebrate for real.
Sorry, I don’t mean to rain on anyone’s parade. I just don’t see how getting pulled from the ballot in a state he’d never win anyway changes anything.
– @jpd9355
2 hours ago (edited)
This is a violation of the freedom of speech. Some of us actually want to vote for him in protest to Biden. I don’t see how this will stand. I pay taxes and will vote for him again even if I have to write him in.
– @anthonyc6845
43 seconds ago
He was found not guilty on the insurrection so I don’t know how this would stick, if so this is no longer America..
@masepos
1 minute ago
Save “democracy” by stopping democracy to play out.
– @raykaren87
1 hour ago
This is so wrong! People need to have the choice to vote for who they want to. I don’t even think it’s legal to bar someone.
– @joeloconte2314
1 minute ago
I thought we the people get to vote for who we want? Let the people speak. I mean they all say he will lose so why are they scared?